I don't like it, both in style way, and in the internal implementation way.Сообщение от NEO SPECTRUMAN
I was already checking few weeks back, if it would make sense to add the common C/shellscript/.. way of using backslash at end of line, and I can't recall the details now, but the implementation with current sjasmplus internals wouldn't be particularly easy. The block comment proposal is pretty much the same thing, so it would run into the same problems, and it's even less intuitive than backslash (at least for C programmers), seems like bigger "hack".
So some way to "add" to DEFARRAY is lot more preferred, long multi-line feature is more complicated. There are fixed-size 2048 chars buffers all around the code, and even if you overcome that, there are some things like macro/dup reading the source into string-linked-list buffers of their own, so adding backslash for multi-line would need changes on several places of code, while adding "DEFARRAYADD" is almost single short new-block of code, without risk of breaking some complex state in parsing... Actually I'm mentally still in the process of trying to simplify the line parsing / file reading (to have less code paths and fewer code duplicities), maybe after I will give up on that, I will check again for adding backslash feature, but I don't see much pressure for it. This DEFARRAY is first clear case where it would really help, but most of the other cases can be avoided in reasonable way.
So at this moment the "add" variant has much higher chance, I will maybe try it today if I will find some time along work.
Ответить с цитированием