SjASMPlus от z00m

[Ped7g]

Кстатида. про "END"
Это теперь зарезервированное слово??

It was always directive, documented as: http://z00m128.github.io/sjasmplus/d...on.html#po_end

The assembler will stop at this point. The pseudo-op END does NOT work in the beginning of line (even with --dirbol).

(it's more than 10 years old paragraph)

But it didn't work as documented, so I fixed it around v1.11 or v1.12 to work as the docs describe.

*Today* I'm not sure if that was the smartest idea, maybe I should have kept the dirEND() as it was, and change the documentation to describe what the code really does (was just setting "start" address for some other commands like savetap/savesna/...).

в другом, хорошем, компиляторе - пофиг на расположение.

Nice, so you can use whatever you like and you have options.
But JFYI, if you are talking about https://github.com/sjasmplus/sjasmplus ... it has the same quote in the documentation. So if the END doesn't stop assembling in it, in my view it is a bug (I'm used to treat docs as source of truth, so for me it was clearly bug in the code, but as I wrote, with the experience I collected in recent months, I'm not that sure about it, changing the docs post-fact may be sometimes better solution, than "fixing bug" in the code).

The examples you posted work as intended.
(`END` at beginning of line is label, after whitespace it's keyword, the --dirbol does NOT enable END at beginning of line (fully fixed in 1.14.3) ... plus add the syntax ambiguity of sjasmplus, where every directive can be prefixed with single dot, so the same rules apply to ".END" string, beginning of line = local label, after white space = stopping assembler)

[Advertiser]

[Shadow Maker]

It was always directive, documented as: http://z00m128.github.io/sjasmplus/d...on.html#po_end

(it's more than 10 years old paragraph)

But it didn't work as documented, so I fixed it around v1.11 or v1.12 to work as the docs describe.

*Today* I'm not sure if that was the smartest idea, maybe I should have kept the dirEND() as it was, and change the documentation to describe what the code really does (was just setting "start" address for some other commands like savetap/savesna/...).

By me you should just change the docs instead of changing the behavior, as in 10 years people have lot of source code and probably there are quite a lot of similar things, which make people frustrate on such trivial matter.

[dlancer]

I would rather write


So I can easily change the variable name I pass instead of having to change all of them every time I want to change filename.

Вот так можно:

   define filename "test.tap"

   savetap filename, BASIC,"noAutorun",label,100  
   ....

[Shadow Maker]

Вот так можно:

   define filename "test.tap"

   savetap filename, BASIC,"noAutorun",label,100  
   ....

Ясно, я что-то не подумал. Ок.